Describe Books Supposing The Known World
Original Title: | The Known World |
ISBN: | 0061159174 (ISBN13: 9780061159176) |
Edition Language: | English |
Setting: | United States of America |
Literary Awards: | Pulitzer Prize for Fiction (2004), Anisfield-Wolf Book Award (2004), National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction (2003), Hurston/Wright Legacy Award Nominee for Debut Fiction (2004), National Book Award Finalist for Fiction (2003) International Dublin Literary Award (2005) |
Edward P. Jones
Paperback | Pages: 388 pages Rating: 3.83 | 33424 Users | 3120 Reviews

Particularize Of Books The Known World
Title | : | The Known World |
Author | : | Edward P. Jones |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | Later Printing edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 388 pages |
Published | : | August 29th 2006 by Amistad (first published 2003) |
Categories | : | Historical. Historical Fiction. Fiction. Cultural. African American |
Rendition Concering Books The Known World
One of the most acclaimed novels in recent memory, The Known World is a daring and ambitious work by Pulitzer Prize winner Edward P. Jones.The Known World tells the story of Henry Townsend, a black farmer and former slave who falls under the tutelage of William Robbins, the most powerful man in Manchester County, Virginia. Making certain he never circumvents the law, Townsend runs his affairs with unusual discipline. But when death takes him unexpectedly, his widow, Caldonia, can't uphold the estate's order, and chaos ensues. Jones has woven a footnote of history into an epic that takes an unflinching look at slavery in all its moral complexities.
Rating Of Books The Known World
Ratings: 3.83 From 33424 Users | 3120 ReviewsCrit Of Books The Known World
Basically - a book about slavery in the South. I enjoy those kind of thing, especially The Secret Lives of Bees, but with this one, it felt like the book had no point. While I was reading, I kept on going "what did I just read? Am I really reading/understanding this book?" and kept on referring to the back cover of the book. No. The story was simply what I read. O.......K! Then ugh. I HATE leaving a book unread, so I kept on forcing myself to read thru the whole book. Finally the misery I wasThis book demands that you read it slowly and intently. Like eating a huge Thanksgiving dinner, you need to pause and digest before you have the next course. At the outset, the plot seems to be all over the place, bouncing from character to character, telling too many stories, not telling enough and then seeming to tell too much. Ah, but then, you make a little progress and the rhythm begins to assert itself, the stories begin to weave together, the minute details begin to become a diorama, the
2.5-stars, really.here is a perfect example of a books i should love, and yet.... i didn't. the book was a lot of work and, for me, very little reward. i think most of my issues are because of the style/structure of the novel: * the third-person, omniscient narrator - this was distracting from very early on in the read. i held off judging it. i wanted to trust jones and his choice.* non-linear narrative - i don't tend to have problems with this at all, but i found it super-clunky here. also

Despite some luminous moments where the characters come alive in a special way, this novel about the lives of slaves in a fictional community in Virginia of the 1830s felt too hermetic and sealed off for me to enjoy it as thoroughly as others might.The special hook that the story holds is its rendering of freed blacks who became slave owners themselves. The focus is on one such plantation with about 30 slaves which is struggling to adapt to the death of its black master, Henry Townsend. We get a
There is probably an important and interesting story in here somewhere (for example, if it were actually about the widow of a black slave owner trying to run a plantation after her husband's death, as claimed on the book jacket). However, any plot that might exist was buried so deep beneath the convoluted chronology and extraneous characters and details that I decided I didn't care to keep digging for it, and quit on page 198. The author seemed determined to insert every existing anecdote about
there is that old adage that a good book will tell you how to read it. and i have no idea to whom that should be attributed, only that my undergrad professors seemed to have been born to quote that thought endlessly: in my gothic lit class, my enlightenment class, my victorian lit class... the african and irish lit professors mostly kept their mouths shut on the subject. but the rest - hoo boy - did they love to drag that old chestnut out... and it makes sense, to a certain degree. but this book
I'm going to have to rave a bit, because this is one of the best books I've read in the past ten years.Jones packs in all the historical detail you could want, and of course he's hit on a subject--black slaveowners--that in and of itself is tabloid-sensational. Where lesser writers might lean too hard on the sensational aspect (or rely on it to bolster an otherwise weak narrative), Jones works it into a compelling and powerful story.What makes it so powerful is a mix of fascinating characters
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.